What Map Are You Using?
I recently attained my NLP Master Practitioner certification. It’s a set of skills that, once you acquire them, you wonder how you ever got by without them. NLP stands for Neuro Linguistic Programming. Created more than fifty years ago, NLP is about figuring out what makes outstanding people outstanding. The simple idea behind NLP is that once you understand how someone “does” their greatness, you can model it and achieve similar results. A popular phrase in NLP is “The map is not the territory.” This means that every person, by virtue of their unique life experience, has their own distinct map of the world. It explains why two people, exposed to the same event, experience the event differently. In my coaching practice, this insight also helped me understand why two people, seeking different outcomes, rely on the same belief. Coaching is about making identity-level shifts in people. For one step in this process, people harness empowering states that they then condition until the emotional bedrock of that state becomes the new standard in their lives. Sometimes a client wants confidence for that bedrock. Another client seeks joy. A third wants an emotional home of courage. These clients come from different parts of the world, have varied backgrounds and experiences, and each is seeking an outcome that is distinct for them. Yet when asked what they believe about themselves, what does each one say? They believe anything is possible. After thousands of coaching calls, I have heard this from hundreds of clients. Unique desires and goals, common belief. So if everyone carries a different map, then here’s the unsettling question: what map are you using when you read Scripture – and where did you get it? Most people inherit maps drawn by someone else: a childhood church they attended before they were old enough to question it. A frightening sermon heard at exactly the wrong age. A parent’s anxieties, passed down like a precious family heirloom. A culture that told them what the Bible says before they ever cracked one open. My map was partly formed by these little cartoon books that seemed to be made for kids. I recall one suggesting I would stand before God’s throne to be judged. By the time most people form an opinion about God, they aren’t reading the territory at all. They’re reading a map someone else sketched for them – often badly, sometimes cruelly, and almost always secondhand. This map reading comes with a cost. People walk away from God entirely because of the map they were handed. They never disliked the territory, because they never actually went there. They rejected the drawing, mistaking it for the place. It’s like refusing to visit Paris because someone gave you a smudged, ugly sketch and told you that was the city. Now here’s something I only recently learned. That phrase – “the map is not the territory” – goes back almost one hundred years. A man named Alfred Korzybski made his mark by analyzing how language shapes perception and coined the phrase back in 1933. He said something else that struck me once I understood where my own work was heading. Korzybski said: the word is not the thing. It seems obvious, and the modern world eagerly agrees. Of course the word is not the thing. Words are labels, pointers, abstractions – they gesture at reality from a safe distance, but they’re never the reality itself. The menu is not the meal. The map is not the territory. The word is not the thing. And then the Hebrew Bible walks up and overturns the apple cart. In ancient Hebrew, the word and the thing share one substance. There’s a single term – davar – that means word, and event, and object, all at once. When God speaks in Genesis, the speaking and the happening are one motion. “Let there be light” is not a description of a light that then shows up separately. The saying is the light. The word doesn’t point at the territory. The word lays it down. Sit for a moment with how strange that is. If you’ve ever seen a basic contour map, you can appreciate there is a safe distance between the symbol and the thing it stands for. A lot of squiggly lines drawn tightly together represent the mountain. They are not the mountain. The Hebrew imagination collapses that distance to nothing. In that world, to speak is to make. To name is to summon. The word and the world are not two things passing messages across a gap. They are one substance, briefly wearing two faces. Hundreds of coaching clients, scattered across the globe, chasing wildly different dreams. Each with the same bedrock: anything is possible. I used to treat that as a useful mindset, a good map to steer by. Now, I’m no longer certain it’s only a map. If the oldest understanding of language is right – if word and thing really are one substance – then what we speak over our own lives may not be describing the territory at all. It may be drawing it. That thread quietly changes everything – how a person reads Scripture, how they pray, how they speak about themselves in the private interior of their being. The Bible wasn’t intended to be read as a map of a faraway land you might visit after life. Read the way it was built to be read, it claims to be territory itself – living ground that forms under the feet of the person willing to walk it. What does this mean? The words we use to describe our experience of life become our experience of life. In closing, allow me a moment of honesty. You could rightly say that my book, Resurrection: Breathing with God is another map – that I am just one more person handing you his sketch and insisting it’s better than the one you’ve got. It’s a fair charge. In response, one of the biggest